The Antichrist - Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - Platanus Publishing
Hiç mesaj bulunmadı
Taksit | Tutar | Toplam |
---|---|---|
Tek Çekim | 184.80 TL | 184.80 TL |
2 Taksit | 92.40 TL | 184.80 TL |
3 Taksit | 65.30 TL | 195.89 TL |
4 Taksit | 49.43 TL | 197.74 TL |
5 Taksit | 39.92 TL | 199.58 TL |
6 Taksit | 33.57 TL | 201.43 TL |
Taksit | Tutar | Toplam |
---|---|---|
Tek Çekim | 184.80 TL | 184.80 TL |
Taksit | Tutar | Toplam |
---|---|---|
Tek Çekim | 184.80 TL | 184.80 TL |
2 Taksit | 96.10 TL | 192.19 TL |
Taksit | Tutar | Toplam |
---|---|---|
Tek Çekim | 184.80 TL | 184.80 TL |
2 Taksit | 92.40 TL | 184.80 TL |
3 Taksit | 64.06 TL | 192.19 TL |
4 Taksit | 48.51 TL | 194.04 TL |
5 Taksit | 39.18 TL | 195.89 TL |
6 Taksit | 32.96 TL | 197.74 TL |
Taksit | Tutar | Toplam |
---|---|---|
Tek Çekim | 184.80 TL | 184.80 TL |
2 Taksit | 96.10 TL | 192.19 TL |
3 Taksit | 64.68 TL | 194.04 TL |
4 Taksit | 48.97 TL | 195.89 TL |
Ödeme Türü | Toplam Tutar |
---|---|
Diğer Kredi Kartları | 184.80 TL |
Havale / Eft | 184.80 TL |
Posta Çeki | 184.80 TL |
Kapıda Ödeme | 199.80 TL |
Kapıda ödemeli siparişlerde +15,00TL kapıda ödeme hizmet bedeli ilave edilir. |
- Vade farksız taksitler KOYU renkte gösterilmektedir.
- X+X şeklinde belritilen taksitler (Örneğin: 2+3) 2 taksit olarak işleme alınmakta ancak ilgili bankanın kampanyası dahilinde 2 taksit üzerinden işlem yapıldığı halde 2+3 yani 5 taksit olarak kartınıza ve ödemenize yansımaktadır. (2 taksit seçilmiş olsa bile banka kampanyası dahilinde ekstradan vade farkı eklenmeden işlem 5 taksite bölünmektedir.)
The Antichrist - Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - Platanus Publishing
Of all Nietzsche’s b books, “The Antichrist” comes nearest to conventionality in form. It presents a connected argument with very few interludes, and has a beginning, a middle and an end. Most of his works are in the form of collections of apothegms, and sometimes the subject changes on every second page. This fact constitutes one of the counts in the orthodox indictment of him: it is cited as proof that his capacity for consecutive thought was limited, and that he was thus deficient mentally, and perhaps a downright moron. The argument, it must be obvious, is fundamentally nonsensical. What deceives the professors is the traditional prolixity of philosophers. Because the average philosophical writer, when he essays to expose his ideas, makes such inordinate drafts upon the parts of speech that the dictionary is almost emptied these defective observers jump to the conclusion that his intrinsic notions are of corresponding weight.